SPARKIT
← Back to blog

SPARKIT is live

By · Updated July 14, 2026

Updated July 14, 2026: Benchmark figures in this launch post now match the current evaluation. The canonical methods, exact comparators, and limitations live on the benchmark pages.

Today SPARKIT goes live: a scientific research agent in an API.

One call deploys an agent that retrieves and synthesizes the relevant literature, performs any analyses the question requires, and returns a Markdown report. On HLE-Gold, the gold-standard subset of Humanity's Last Exam, SPARKIT scores 54.4%, compared with 39.0% for direct GPT-5.6-Sol and 34.9% for direct Claude Opus 4.8.

The shape of the API is intentionally tiny:

from sparkit_science import SparkitClient

client = SparkitClient(api_key="sk_sparkit_...")
report = client.research(
    "What is the role of BRCA1 in homologous recombination?"
)
print(report)

Get an API key at app.sparkit.science/signup. Pricing is on /pricing, start with Try-it for $10 and 5 queries.

We'll post deeper writeups, benchmark updates, and engineering notes here. Star the GitHub org for release notifications.

How to think about the deep-research tool landscape

Perplexity, ChatGPT Deep Research, Gemini Deep Research, Claude Research, Elicit, SPARKIT — the deep-research category has converged on the basics. The remaining differences are about audience, deployment surface, and how each tool treats citations. A map of who builds what for whom, and where SPARKIT fits.

Read post →